Wednesday, January 28, 2009

Disrupted Balance: How Paramount Alienated the Avatar The Last Airbender Fan base

Disrupted Balance:
How Paramount Alienated the Avatar: The Last Airbender fan base


By Claire Gill



The relationship between media companies and online participatory fandoms is difficult to define, categorize, or even understand from an outside source. While media producers create television programs, music, and movies that people all over the world view and enjoy, there is a select group of people among these who are part of online subcultures devoted to the various texts that are produced. These fans are often brand loyal and have been embraced by some of the most long lived franchises in both film and television.


In recent times, most particularly through the rise of the Internet as both an advertising forum and a social networking medium. This has increased the amount of media that companies expose to potential consumers, including fandoms. Said media is then analyzed and adapted by fans, who become very protective and loyal to texts they form attachments with. Fans engage with one another on message boards, in role playing forums. They create fan art and construct elaborate costumes that emulate their favorite characters. In short, they provide a lot of free advertising for media companies, as well as form a loyal fan base which “supports” its property of choice by purchasing it, as well as other ancillary products that have the property brand. With this “support” often comes a feeling of partial ownership on the part of the fans, which can result in a clash between them and the companies that hold the intellectual copyrights to the fandom’s chosen text.


The latest outcry of fandom against a cinematic appropriation of a text is in the case of M. Night Shymalan’s next film, The Last Airbender, based on the Nickelodeon cartoon, Avatar: The Last Airbender. The series was an epic that spanned three seasons and was set in an alternate world where elemental “bending,” a sort of inner magic that allows certain people known as benders to manipulate the elements of their world depending on their heritage, is central to the balance of humanity and the natural world.


What has angered the fans is the disloyalty of the planned movie to the original text. Avatar The Last Airbender as a television show was primarily based on ancient Asian culture and spiritual ideas. The costumes, traditions, and appearances of characters in the series are almost all Asian in appearance and theme with the exception of the Water Tribe, which is heavily influenced by Inuit culture. Likewise, the series’ characters were designed to look Asian and Native American. However, when the casting for the live action adaptation was released, it was revealed that the four main characters would be played by white actors. In the original series, these characters were depicted as having either an Asian (Aang and Zuko) or Native American (Sokka and Katara) appearance.



Screenshot: Katara, Aang, and Sokka from Season 1.

To many fans, the casting of white actors in the roles of nonwhite characters has caused a rift between them and the owners of the original text. In this case, Paramount/Nickelodeon is viewed, by fans, as being out of touch with not only the fans, but also the original text. The comments of the casting director regarding erroneous ethnic costuming caused a further stir online fan backlash that deemed the company which controlled the rights to Avatar to be unfamiliar not only with the fan base, but also with its own text.


As of this writing, there is a general consensus among the online fandom of Avatar, who sometimes refer to themselves as Avatards to indicate a high level of textual loyalty and online fan participation, that the upcoming film is not a recreation of the original text, but rather a “whitewashed,” mainstream re-imagining. Many fans, upon hearing of the casting decisions for the main four characters, have decided to not support the movie. What this means in terms of participatory fandom is that the fandom will not buy movie tickets or ancillary products, or encourage anyone else to. This is a drastic step for the Avatar fan base, as they have previously been extremely active in terms of the generation of fan media and the purchasing of branded merchandise. Losing the faith of such a dedicated fandom could prove troublesome for Paramount. While the film will undoubtedly make at least some money, the separation of a fan community and the long awaited feature film could have a financial backlash

This shows the lack of understanding of the property, which is peculiar on the part of Paramount, the owners of the perennial Star Trek franchise. Paramount embraces the Trekkies and has learned the benefits that a long term participatory fandom community can offer.


This is not the first instance of the Avatar fandom feeling alienated by Paramount, merely the latest and most extreme. Since 2005, several events have caused growing rifts between the fandom and the parent company that owns Avatar. One of the first events that caused some disconnect between the parent company and the fandom was an action figure licensing deal with toy giant, Mattel. When the figures reached stores, none of the series’ strong female characters were included in the assortment. Actually, no female characters were included in the assortment. This caused an immediate backlash with fans of the series who felt that the show presented positive, strong female characters. The absence of Katara, the respnsible, hopeful Waterbender, as well as Toph, the blind, spunky Earthbending prodigy caused a letter writing campaign that pleaded with Mattel to release figures of these fan favorite characters. Many of these petitions and letters remain open, despite the disappearance of toys from store shelves as the line ended (http://www.oafe.net/articulation/0707.php).


Further fan alienation occurred when Nickelodeon aired Season 3 in two parts, with more than six months between airing the first half of the season and the second half of the season, despite the fact that the episodes were completed. The original airdate was pushed from late spring to midsummer, causing a scheduling conflict with the release of a novelized adaptation of the series finale, which was released in the Spring of 2008 to coincide with the original scheduled air date. As such, many fans bought the book and read the end of the series rather than wait an additional two months to find out what happened.


When M. Night Shymalan was announced as the director of a trilogy of films based off the series, fans were skeptical, but hopeful. Now in the wake of a “whitewashing” of a predominantly Asian and Inuit culture influenced series, as well as the following culturally ignorant statements on the part of Deedee Rickets, the film’s casting director in reference to the open casting call for extras:

“”We want you to dress in traditional cultural ethnic attire," she said. "If you're Korean, wear a kimono. If you're from Belgium, wear lederhosen."(http://media.www.dailypennsylvanian.com/media/storage/paper882/news/2009/01/23/News/Try-Out.For.A.Role.For.M.Night.Shyamalan-3594896.shtml)



With the release of that statement, many fans have withdrawn complete interest from the film, feeling that their text is in the hands of people who are unfamiliar with it and don’t care enough about it to familiarize themselves with it or with the participatory fandom participants who hold it dear. Others have written letters expressing their concern over casting decisions to Paramount. There is currently a schism between the Avatar> fandom and the legal owners of the text as to what the film should be, one that only time and possibly recasting will be able to heal, if Paramount wants it healed, that is.





Links/Information of Interest:
A LiveJournal Community regarding the whitewashing of the Avatar movie has been created and has initiated a well spoken letter writing campaign to change the cast to a more ethnically diverse and series accurate cast:
http://aang-aint-white.livejournal.com/646.html
An excellent fan blog entry on this topic can be found here:
http://derekkirkkim.blogspot.com/2009/01/new-day-in-politics-same-old-racist.html

If you would like to address this subject, letters should be directed to:
Kathleen Kennedy and Frank Marshall
Kennedy/Marshall Company
619 Arizona Avenue, Fl. 2
Santa Monica, California 90401



Thursday, January 15, 2009

More fun with Dinosaurs


They're your friends and a whole lot more.


For those of you who just missed that reference, Google "Denver The Last Dinosaur"

What I love about this image, another random find on the glorious interweb, is that is is both nonsensical and intelligent. Why would a carnosaur be interested in either Hamlet or Terminator sequels?
I have no idea.
This particular Tyranosaurus Rex is also fluent in English.
Ponder that, why don't you?

What we also see here is the removal of several things from their original contexts. First, there is the dinosaur. While in its own time period, it was a feared predator, here, it is an anthropomorphized and very green film critic.
Next, there is the proposition that Hamlet, obviously a classic work of English Literature, is a Terminator sequel.

Oddly, the dinosaur is correct here in that Hamlet is okay (in its original context), but disappoints at every conceivable level as a Terminator sequel. This is also accurate. Hamlet does not feature time traveling cyborgs, dystopian futures, or anything that a person coming to a Terminator text would expect. Therefore, it is highly probable that if someone were to hypothetically approach Hamlet as a Terminator sequel, they could consider it an "okay" story that has nothing in common with previous canonical texts.
Of course, Hamlet has existed after dinosaurs, but well before Terminator sequels (one great, one passable, and a television show I can't pass judgement on because I haven't seen), but since we're dealing with a series (Temrinator) whose canon contains time travel, anything is possible.

Wednesday, January 14, 2009

Film Review: Ratatouille

“Not everyone can be a great artist...but a great artist can come from anywhere”
-Anton Ego, Ratatouille
Ratatouille, the latest entry into the Brad Bird canon, is a salute to all things bold and individual. As in the director’s previous films (The Iron Giant and The Incredibles), the unique is celebrated and embraced...once it has been given the chance to prove itself. This is not accomplished overnight, but through a series of character building trials in which the hero risks life and limb. These problems can be extremely problematic when you’re, well, a rat.
Remy (Patton Oswalt) is a country rat with a passion for cooking, a hobby which borders on obsession that frequently leads the lovable rodent into situations that seemingly ruin his life. In the first instance, his amazing sense of smell goes from saving his fathers to making him into his family’s “poison checker”. When Remy tries to teach his dim, but loving brother, Emile (Peter Sohn) the finer aspects of taste, they end up being struck by lightning, causing the discovery and subsequent destruction of their gargantuan nest. The family is separated in the ensuing evacuation and Remy finds himself alone for the first time. When he rises from the baptismal waters of the sewer, the young rat realizes he has been under the streets of Paris, more specifically, the restaurant of his cooking idol, Gusteau (Brad Garrett). It is there that Remy’s gift finally begins to shine. After befriending Linguini (Lou Romano), a talentless, but somehow charming plongeur, the two team up to fulfill their dreams.
Bird's work is exceptional here. I found myself liking Ratatouille much more than his previous Pixar installment, The Incredibles. While clever and entertaining, I found it simply had too much going on to really identify with any of its wonderfully colorful characters. Ratatouille feels much closer to The Iron Giant in terms of character development and life lessons garnered (the size differences in the protagonists of each not withstanding). Both films are about coming to terms with yourself and choosing who you are. In this day and age, where everyone seems to be clamoring over the same designer handbags and Abercrombie couture, it is refreshing to experience a film that blatantly celebrates not only individualism, but its acceptance by the one most likely to denounce it...a critic. Thus, Ratatouille is a morality fable for the artist’s soul and visual eye candy for the viewer. While not everyone can make a great film, this one solidifies my own personal belief that good films come from Pixar.

Tuesday, January 13, 2009

FIRST POST: Happiest Dinosaur Ever


POSTMODERNISM: IT IS WHAT'S MUNDANE *!

Also this.

I have no idea where this image originated. I found it on my hard drive without explanation or grouped with a like-file.

I guess that's alright...I mean, this image floating in cyberspace is probably a lot more interesting than any explanation I could have for it...except for maybe aliens.

*Please note that postmodernism is anything but mundane in the traditional sense. "Mundane" here refers to the real world, the unplugged, non blogging, not 56K Modem world. The one without the pop up ads and the RP forums...though it has plenty of instances of ROTFLOL...or at the very least LOL.